Apple, Google, Meta Must Face Lawsuits Over Casino-Style Gambling Apps, Judge Rules

Apple, Google, Meta Must Face Lawsuits Over Casino-Style Gambling Apps, Judge Rules

GeokHub

GeokHub

Contributing Writer

1 min read
1.0x

A U.S. federal judge has denied motions by Apple, Google, and Meta to dismiss consolidated lawsuits that claim the tech giants facilitated illegal gambling through casino-style apps on their platforms. The judge ruled that their roles in processing payments and collecting commissions mean they could be held liable despite their arguments for immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

The plaintiffs argue that these companies promoted addictive, harmful apps—slot-machine style games—that led to serious consequences for users, including financial loss, depression, and even suicidal thoughts. Claims include that the platforms took up to 30% commissions on virtual chip purchases, generating revenues topping $2 billion.

While some state law claims were dismissed, most consumer protection claims were allowed to proceed outside California. The judge also certified the decision for immediate appeal given its significance, particularly regarding how Section 230 should apply when platforms facilitate transactions rather than simply hosting content.

Share this article

Help others discover this content

Topics

#Apple Google Meta gambling lawsuit#social casino apps liability#Section 230 tech immunity#consumer protection cases tech platforms# virtual casino apps federal ruling

Comments

You must sign in to comment.

No comments yet. Be the first!

Continue Reading

Discover more articles on similar topics that you might find interesting